An expressed lynch pin in the pro-life argument is that every human life is of absolute value. An often unexpressed, but necessary component to the pro-choice argument is that some human lives are less valuable than others. This value differentiation is sometimes put in terms of actual value and sometimes is expressed in philosophies that refuse to label some human life with terms like "human" or "person." But no matter the form of expression the conclusion is the same - some human lives are worth less than others.
The pro-life position must hold to a principle that creates the only maintainable guard-rails for this argument: every human life is of inestimable worth. If any human life is estimable then you can, and many do, put a dollar amount on a human being and treat it accordingly. It has been argued over and over that without this principle in place, all kinds of incredible and bloody things become possible. Often the pro-lifer is mocked as an alarmist, tugging emotions to make their case. But the case is based on a simple, if often vilified, principle that keeps weak humans from becoming the targets of powerful humans.
Right now, the pro-choice position has sway in large parts of the Western world, and so it should not surprise us that some places of health and healing have gone so far as to use the remains of miscarried and aborted babies to stoke the furnaces. It should break our hearts, but it should not surprise us.
From the article in the UK Telegraph:
At least 15,500 foetal remains were incinerated by 27 NHS trusts over the last two years alone, Channel 4’s Dispatches discovered.
The programme, which will air tonight, found that parents who lose children in early pregnancy were often treated without compassion and were not consulted about what they wanted to happen to the remains....
One of the country’s leading hospitals, Addenbrooke’s in Cambridge, incinerated 797 babies below 13 weeks gestation at their own ‘waste to energy’ plant. The mothers were told the remains had been ‘cremated.’
Another ‘waste to energy’ facility at Ipswich Hospital, operated by a private contractor, incinerated 1,101 foetal remains between 2011 and 2013.
What was at one time considered a ludicrous warning (that severe and gruesome things will happen to people and with their remains if the pro-choice movement has their way) has become reality. It has never been a slippery-slope argument to say that the pro-choice position will lead to things like involuntary euthanasia (already happening in parts of Europe), or now the desecration of infant bodies without the consent of their parents. It has always been a logical extension of the principles and values at the heart of the pro-choice movement.
On a related note, doesn't anyone ever read Jonathan Swift's, "A Modest Proposal" in school anymore?