I think if that defines our theology, our distinctive as Pentecostals,
we have missed most of what was intended by the gift of the Holy Spirit.
Let me first say that I believe in the reality of those
things, experience and practice them, and even pray for them. I believe they have a powerful role in the lives
of individual Christians and in the body of Christ. I am not going to deny any of that, but I am
going to argue for something that might strike some Pentecostals as bordering
on wanting to have my papers revoked: all those things are derivative truths of
Pentecostal theology. By derivative I
mean they are the logical theological extensions of what we believe about the
power and reality of the Spirit of God.
Our distinctive theology ought to begin with a pneumatology and then lead
to charismata, miracles, and so forth. A
Pentecostal theology that begins with a few effects and uses them to
categorically define the cause will miss a lot of biblical insight, and in all
honesty, will leave a lot of people undiscipled and badly formed.
If, however, we begin at the beginning – the nature and
power of the cause of Pentecost – everything will begin to fall into place,
including the more spectacular and public gifts of the Spirit. The beginning is simply this fact:
Pentecostals believe in the imminent, active, and powerful action of the Holy Spirit
among the disciples of Jesus Christ, in His church, and in the world today. If we use a framework like this to begin
discovering the role of the Holy Spirit among believers, we have available to
us the whole of Scriptural teaching on the Spirit. If we open this conceptual door first, we
become aware of so much more than just a few manifestations.
For instance, the fruit of the Spirit are Pentecostal realities. Paul describes that familiar list as the
consequence of the work of the Spirit, not the achieved character traits of really
successful Christ-followers. They are
fruit – the inevitable consequence of healthy trees. As such, the fruit of the Spirit are the
character traits of the third member of the Trinity having his way within our
lives. If this is achieved by even a
small group of disciples, we have people living with each other, God, and
toward the world in love, joy, peace, patience, and so forth. A more powerful and spiritual group of people
would be hard to imagine, and if this isn’t Pentecostal I don’t know what is.
Then, keeping this same group of fruitful believers in
mind, imagine them exercising gifts like glossolalia and prophecy. They begin with a divine power and wisdom
behind what they do and say with each other, so their expression of these unique
gifts is filled with kindness, gentleness, faith, and so forth. Has not every Pentecostal pastor prayed that
when people express the gift of tongues and interpretation in public that they
do so in a Christ-like fashion? Is that
frustrated prayer the reason why so many churches that are Pentecostal in
theology are not so in practice? How can
we expect fruit-less believers to suddenly handle a gift with that much power
and potency as if they were fruitful?
And yet, the standard Pentecostal model ignores the
primary work of the Spirit, building Christ-like disciples, and emphasizes the
effects and then we are frustrated when they are consistently abused and used
to abuse.
I am aware of these kinds of conversations taking place
in some academic circles, but it needs to be brought to pastors and church
leaders. After all, these are the front
lines where most of the training in Christ-likeness takes place and where it
too often suffers it most grievous losses.
The Holy Spirit is now God with us to enact the will and kingdom of God
among his people and in his creation.
This is a vision so much larger than any of us can imagine, and so much
larger than a short list of our favored spiritual gifts can ever encompass. Let us begin with the presence and power of
God among us first and then learn to talk about the expression of the Spirit
among us.
4 comments:
Well said. I think the gifts have been for far too long something thought of as a means to an end rather than the fruit, the result of a deeper inward change. They often end up as weapons in the hands of otherwise well meaning believers.
Agreed. I have attended churches and have witnessed the gifts used in such a way that they seemed to be thought of more as a means to an end rather than the fruit of the inward change claimed. Essentially, power tools in the hands of children.
Well thought out, Phil. I am teaching a course on Pneumatology in January. With your permission, I will use this blog as a starting point for the class to consider.
Larry - sounds good to me, and I hope it is helpful!
Post a Comment